Attendance Sergey Baranov Paul Bennett (from Wednesday 15:00) Willem Botha Anton Ertl Ulrich Hoffmann (from Thursday 10:40-12:30, 16:45-18:00, Friday 9:00-) Peter Knaggs Stephen Pelc Leon Wagner Gerald Wodni Sergey Baranov and Paul Bennett were voted to be allowed as voting members (6Y:0:0) The Minutes are an accurate representation of the last meeting: 5Y:2A:0 2.5 Process Amendmends Stephen Pelc's points: Focus Libraries Minutes Acceptance issues (reduce the size of CORE) Marketing We need a driver/chaser Libraries: relative filenames package format little workshop for package description format Small embedded systems and the standard Some discussion, no resolution Discussion on how to load the float wordset portably, and loading libraries in general. Process Minutes Do an electronic vote on the minutes two weeks after the last revision (that had no comments) The electronic vote runs for 14 days Separate Minutes for electronic meetings, same procedure Voting rights are gained and lost from attending physical meetings Revised text of committee membership and electronic meeting 8Y:0:0 Try out a public electronic meeting Fix S" make an RfD (volunteer AE) 3a) 1 chars = 1: 6Y:3A:0, 3 people will need more time, so we will vote on it again 3b) 2s-complement: accepted, further wordsmithing 8Y:0:0 4a) quotations: Feedback: We need to wait some more time for experience The RfD needs to be out on the Forth200x mailing list It would be useful to have: Numbers on the number of short single-use ticked words in programs or on return-address manipulation uses that could be replaced with that 4b) recognizers: Feedback: Needs some more years and more changes to the proposal Criticized things: R:FAIL really necessary? Don't require specific implemention of the text interpreter Allow keeping existing text interpreters for backward compatibility and allow gradual transition More flexible recognizer list handling Allow switching between prepared recognizer lists 4c) Not yet RfD: Packages and Libraries Needs two words 5) No RfCs to discuss 6) Forth Wiki Demonstration and Disciussion 7) a) Library process b) meaning of xt etc.: delay discussion c) AE does the alternative double input thing d) GW is working on a proposal e) BP should do something, because he has experience with multi-threading f) Internationalisation: Do it as a library: SP, WB g) Cross-compiler: drop it h) IEEE FP: proponents missing; consider a reduced proposal i) Directories/filename: Proponent dropped it j) Memory access: Old proposal too big, try new proposal 9) Next meeting: 2 days again before the next EuroForth