Status of CfV voting? Not yet complete.
(since the September’22 meeting, 2022-09-14/15)
Leave it to the discretion of the editors (Action: AE, ruv)
There should be a specification of an input stack that is also restored by THROW. Fixing this is future work. (reply by AE)
Recommend not to implement it (reply by AE)
Table this until the next meeting.
Actually run it and then respond (Action: UH)
The remainder of the line is determined by character count, not contents (Done: UH)
Actually run it and then respond (Action: UH)
Fix the stack picture (Done: ruv)
Then accept (Action: AE)
No common practice for stick
Fix the stack picture (Done: ruv)
Then accept (Action: AE)
prepare a proposal to destandardize SAVE-INPUT and RESTORE-INPUT (Done: ruv)
If we fail to de-standardize SAVE-INPUT RESTORE-INPUT, we need to look at this issue again.
Actually run it and then respond (reply by AE)
Still needs to be added to the document (Action: AE)
Proceed to CfV (Reply by AE)
Close, and ask contributors to the discussion to do separate topics if they need the stuff to be open. (Reply by AE)
Done
Will be done when the editors find the time.
Supported by Leon Wagner
Discussion about website that supports multiple versions.
Standard meeting 2023-09-13 .. 2023-09-15 in Rome.
We immediately went for:
Action: BP
Do we add things to the standard that are common practice but maybe not desired practice?
Put common but undesired words in Attic or (to be last in the list of wordsets) Zattic.