2023-11-12 13:26:28 - albert
Ask him to volunteer tests (Action: UH)
2023-11-12 13:12:55 - albert
Write an answer containing the criticisms (in particular, buffer overflow safety). If he wants to go on with a proposal, it needs to be more in standard terminology and with standard stack effect comments. Alternatively, add a package to theforth.net (Action: UH)
2023-10-23 01:13:22 - ruv
Discussion. Do we need LATEST-NAME-IN? Make it formal. (Action: ruv)
2023-09-13 12:09:40 - LeonWagner
Fix the n that’s there (should be +n), then make it formal (Done: AE)
2023-12-02 10:43:31 - AntonErtl
Do an issue on github (Done: AE)
2023-12-01 18:08:40 - AntonErtl
Do an issue on github (Done: AE)
2023-11-27 18:02:20 - AntonErtl
Discussion does not indicate a preference for changing the standard.
Still, Ruvim wants to do a proposal. (Action: ruv)
Alternatively, make WORD obsolescent. (Action: SP)
2023-10-23 10:04:08 - ruv
Acceptingly close it. Write an issue on github to allow that workflow. (Action: ruv).
2023-09-23 01:06:43 - ruv
Look at +n vs. u in other words. (Action: ruv)
2023-09-22 17:06:27 - ruv
Make another proposal based on discussions about this proposal (Action: ruv)
Another Interim Meeting on 2024-05-24T14:00Z
On that meeting, start contributions with contribution 318 (contributions also include proposals).
Euroforth ideally September 27-29 (Forth200x Sep 25-27)